玉观音

'Russian Athletes Victims of US Hybrid War', Journo Says as CAS Hears Russian Appeal on Football Ban_我的网站

A |     The CAS held the first of two planned hearings of the Football Union of Russia and club teams’ appeal of a FIFA/UEFA ban from UEFA competition on Tuesday.,Tuesday’s hearing, taking place in Lausanne, Switzerland, will be followed by a second hearing next Monday by four Russian clubs, including Zenit St. Petersburg, the reigning Russian Premier League champions, challenging their exclusion from UEFA competition.,UEFA ruled in May to bar Russian football clubs from all tournaments, including men’s teams and the women’s team for the FIFA Women’s World Cup 2023. At least for the remainder of the current season, Russian teams have been banned from the UEFA Champions League, Europa League, Europa Conference League, Women’s Champions League, and Youth League. The Russian bid to host the Euro 2028 and/or Euro 2032 events has also been preemptively rejected.,In arbitration filed in March, the Football Union of Russia demanded the immediate reinstatement of all teams for competition, arguing the “irreparable harm” that their exclusion would have on tournaments, including the FIFA World Cup, potential sponsorship losses, loss of experience, and loss of opportunity to compete against opponents of high standard. The Russian side also stressed that for players 30 years old or older, the 2022 World Cup constituted “the last chance of their career to play such a tournament.”,Former Formula One Boss Ecclestone Backs Putin Over Conflict With Ukraine30 June, 12:39 GMT,The football union argued that the International Olympic Committee resolution issued in February demanding that Russian athletes and officials be barred from international competition on which FIFA and UEFA based their decisions was “generic,” “does not refer to any legal provision and is not binding upon FIFA,” and that sporting authorities were acting in a “discriminatory” manner by barring Russian players.,FIFA argued that Russian teams’ presence or absence in the World Cup and the Women’s World Cup was “not guaranteed,” and dismissed the fact that some players would miss out on their last chance for their World Cup play as “irrelevant.” Furthermore, the association argued that “pursuant to CAS jurisprudence, private sports associations have a wide autonomy and margin of discretion when deciding on matters related to the competitions which they organize.” The CAS sided with FIFA and UEFA and rejected Russia’s cases in April, prompting FUR to appeal.,US Hybrid War Against Russia,Rick Sterling, a California-based investigative journalist who has written extensively on doping in sports, said he finds it unlikely that the CAS will rule in Russia's favor despite its case's "excellent arguments," among them the idea that you don't punish athletes for the actions of their nations.,"The US invaded Iraq and there was no denunciation let alone a punishment of athletes. The US, France and others overthrew the Libyan government, leaving a destroyed state, without criticism from the IOC or FIFA. So why are the Russian athletes being punished? One reason is because of built-in bias and prejudice. The IOC and FIFA are dominated by the West. It is very damaging that the IOC issued a recommendation that Russian athletes be discriminated against. This is a violation of the Olympic Charter against national discrimination," Sterling says.,"The US is openly and actively working to undermine Russia's image abroad, including in sports. They probably pre-coordinated the response to the special operation. Russian athletes are victims of the US hybrid war against Russia, as are Ukrainians and Russians," the journalist believes.,Football isn’t the only sport to have suffered from politicized bans instituted by world and national sporting authorities in the wake of the escalation of the Ukraine crisis, with tennis, basketball, hockey, skating and skiing competitions also affected. The arbitrary nature of the prohibitions has been exemplified by their random nature, with Russian athletes barred from FIFA play, for example, but allowed to compete in the 2022 Winter Paralympics, and at the US Open tennis tournament.,Top Tennis Stars in Favour of Penalising Wimbledon Over Ban on Russian Players, Report Says11 May, 11:40 GMT,The bans affecting Russia’s football players are just the latest instance of discrimination against the country’s athletes by international sporting bodies in recent years. In 2020, the CAS stripped Russia of its right to use its name, flag, and anthem at the Olympics and world championship events for two years, largely on the basis of the testimony of Grigory Rodchenkov, the former director of the Russian Anti-Doping Center laboratory-turned-informant to the World Anti-Doping who fled to the United States and testified about an alleged Russian “state-run doping program.” Russian officials denied the allegations and accused Rodchenkov of altering doping probe data of Russian athletes to fit the required narrative.。    The debate around cinematic narratives and representation has taken a personal turn as Diljit Dosanjh recently shared a hard-hitting post on his Instagram stories. He shared a report highlighting the stark contrast between the reception of mainstream patriotic films and the ongoing struggle of his long-delayed biopic, Punjab 95. The post shared by Diljit draws a direct comparison between how certain roles are celebrated versus others that face hurdles. It points out that while Diljit receives widespread acclaim for his participation in high-profile patriotic projects like Border 2, his work on the biopic of human rights defender Jaswant Singh Khalra remains in a state of limbo.          The shared content notes that Punjab 95 has been stuck with the CBFC (Central Board of Film Certification) for three years. This delay stands in contrast to the rapid success of other contemporary releases, such as Dhurandhar: The Revenge, which the post mentions is being celebrated even as Punjab 95 continues its battle with the censor board. Punjab 95, directed by Honey Trehan, delves into the life of Jaswant Singh Khalra and his investigations into sensitive historical events in Punjab. The film has reportedly faced demands for extensive cuts and changes, preventing its domestic release for almost 36 months.               The post suggests a perceived disparity in how the film industry and regulatory bodies treat different types of stories. While films that align with established nationalistic themes often find a smooth path to the audience, biographical stories that explore complex human rights issues or historical grievances seem to face a much more rigorous and prolonged screening process.     By sharing this specific critique, Diljit Dosanjh aligned himself with the conversation regarding creative freedom and the importance of telling diverse stories. For now, the contrast between the celebrated mainstream cinema and the stalled biopic of Jaswant Singh Khalra continues to spark a debate about the future of storytelling in Indian cinema.     Also Read: Border 2 OTT Release: When & Where to Watch Sunny Deol’s Film?。

Current article:http://bg8.saorongriwazhaofutouzhaojie.cfd/19jkjt/20260826/13230.html

Published on:13:01:18